Fairness, Trust and Transparency
RoundTable rests on three philosophical principles that define its entire design. First,
fairness as infrastructure — the recognition that in high-stakes coordination, legitimacy is the
product. A surgeon doesn't just need OR time; she needs proof that she wasn't passed over
unfairly. A voter doesn't just need a poll; he needs confidence his voice counted. RoundTable
treats "provable fairness" as a technical requirement, not a nice-to-have.
Second, trust as progressive verification. Traditional systems force a choice: require
identity verification upfront (exclusionary) or allow anonymous participation (vulnerable to
fraud). RoundTable resolves this with gamified trust scoring. New users can participate
immediately at 0.1x vote weight. As they verify email, phone, identity — as they engage
consistently over time — their weight increases to 1.0x. Past votes are retroactively upgraded
when trust increases, so users aren't penalized for being new. Trust becomes something you
build, transparently and progressively, rather than something you assume or deny.
Third, transparency over outcomes. RoundTable doesn't just show results — it shows why
those results occurred. Every decision generates a cryptographic audit trail: the inputs (who
voted, how they ranked), the algorithm (how preferences were weighted), the outputs (who was
selected), and the justification (why Provider A got the slot over Provider B). This isn't for
Claude's benefit or the platform's — it's for the skeptical surgeon, the losing candidate, the
regulatory auditor who needs proof.
Echo Harbor LLC
PO Box 1177
Pecos, NM 87552
+1 (505) 699-3629